Deadlocked Boards: How a Court-Appointed Custodian or Receiver Can Salvage a Stalled Kansas Corporation
The board vote on renewing the credit line split evenly again, and now vendor contracts, a key hire, and the lease are all waiting on directors who cannot act. Kansas law offers a way forward: any stockholder can ask a district court to appoint a neutral custodian who steps in and keeps the company running.
The remedy is not automatic. When the board is deadlocked, you must show that the business is suffering or faces irreparable harm and that the stockholders cannot end the standoff themselves. A receiver is available only if the corporation is insolvent.
At Myers Longhofer in Overland Park, Kansas, we represent business owners and shareholders when internal disputes prevent a company from making important decisions. Before you file anything, you should know what a custodian can and cannot do, which disputes qualify, and whether a less drastic option could break the impasse. A free consultation with our firm can help you understand your options and determine the appropriate next steps.
Under Kansas’s corporate deadlock statute, K.S.A. 17-6516, a district court may appoint one or more custodians for a corporation when any stockholder applies, and one of three situations exists:
The stockholders are deadlocked over directors: At a meeting held to elect directors, the stockholders are so divided that they failed to elect successors for directors whose terms have expired.
The board is deadlocked, and the company is being harmed: The directors are so divided that the board cannot reach the vote it needs to act; the business is suffering or is threatened with irreparable injury, and the stockholders are unable to end the division.
The business has been abandoned. The corporation has stopped operating and has not taken steps within a reasonable time to dissolve, liquidate, or distribute its assets.
Most disputes fall under the second ground, and it carries the heaviest burden. Disagreement alone is not enough. A court will want to see concrete consequences, such as missed financing deadlines, unsigned contracts, or departing employees, along with evidence that the owners cannot fix the problem at the stockholder level.
A 50/50 ownership split is a common example. If you believe a court-appointed custodian may be necessary, begin documenting failed votes, unresolved decisions, and any resulting harm to the business. Note also that the court “may” appoint a custodian, which means the judge has discretion even when the statutory conditions are met.
One procedural detail applies to nonprofits. If the company is a charitable nonstock corporation, the person applying must send a copy of the application to the Kansas Attorney General within one week of filing.
A custodian is there to keep the business operating, not to shut it down. Kansas law gives a custodian the same powers and title as a receiver appointed under K.S.A. 17-6901. Those powers include taking charge of the company’s assets and affairs, collecting debts owed to it, bringing or defending lawsuits in its name, and hiring agents.
However, the custodian’s authority is limited to continuing the business, not liquidating it and distributing its assets. Liquidation becomes possible only if the court orders otherwise or the case involves an abandoned business or certain close corporation dissolution rights.
A receiver is a different appointment. Under the statute, a receiver may be appointed only if the corporation is insolvent. In that situation, the focus moves toward gathering and protecting assets and handling creditor claims, not just restarting normal operations.
Before seeking either appointment, consider the practical tradeoffs. The appointment and its duration remain subject to the court’s orders. During that time, neither side controls the company, and the custodian’s work adds cost to a business already under strain. For that reason, a custodianship is often best viewed as one tool among several for resolving shareholder disputes, alongside negotiated buyouts and enforcing the owners’ existing agreements.
If your company formally elected close corporation status under Kansas law, the court has more options. Under K.S.A. 17-7212, which covers custodians for close corporations, a stockholder may seek a custodian in either of two situations.
The first is when the stockholders manage the business directly, are so divided that the company is suffering or threatened with irreparable injury, and any deadlock-breaking remedy in the articles, bylaws, or a written stockholder agreement has already failed. The second is when the petitioning stockholder has a right to dissolve the corporation under its articles of incorporation.
The same statute allows the court to appoint a provisional director instead of a custodian if that would serve the corporation’s best interests. A provisional director must be impartial, meaning the person cannot be a stockholder or creditor of the company or its affiliates.
A provisional director joins the board but is not a receiver and does not hold a custodian’s powers. This allows the provisional director to participate in board decisions and may help resolve the impasse without immediately transferring the business’s affairs to a custodian. If that approach fails, the court can still appoint a custodian later.
Keep in mind that many small companies are “closely held” without ever electing close corporation status. Your articles of incorporation will show which set of rules applies.
Start with your governing documents. Shareholder agreements and bylaws often include buy-sell provisions, mediation or arbitration requirements, or tie-breaking procedures. For close corporations, showing that those remedies failed is part of what the law requires. For other corporations, a judge deciding whether to use discretionary power will still want to know whether the owners tried the tools they agreed to.
Also confirm what kind of entity you own. These custodian statutes apply to corporations. Different rules and agreements govern a deadlock in a limited liability company, and the available remedies may look quite different.
Finally, consider timing. A board stalemate rarely stays contained. Contracts may expire, lenders may become concerned, and disputes over control may lead to separate claims, including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty. Acting while the business still functions usually gives a court more to work with.
At Myers Longhofer, we can review your articles, bylaws, and shareholder agreement; evaluate whether your situation meets Kansas’s custodian or receiver requirements; and lay out your alternatives, from a negotiated exit to a petition in district court.
We represent clients in complex civil disputes and work with business owners to evaluate practical strategies for resolving corporate deadlocks. Located in Overland Park, Kansas, we work with business owners in Johnson County, including Olathe, Leawood, and Shawnee. Our business litigation attorneys also serve clients in Kansas City, Missouri.
If a divided board or ownership group has stalled your corporation, contact us to schedule a free consultation and discuss your next move.